Hi Take,

 

It is great to hear from you on the 6lo list. Input from practical deployment 
is quite valuable especially if your organization is considering  6lo stack. 

There are couple of ways to contribute:

 

1)      Providing suggested text on the draft and working with the co-authors 
and 6lo-chairs  to update the document

OR

2)      Writing a separate short draft with the suggested texts or use-case 
scenarios  which can be used as the input to the 6lo Applicability & usecase 
document

 

I know  we talked sometime ago off-line, if you have any further questions let 
me and Gabriel know.

 

Regards,

-Samita

 

From: Take Aanstoot [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2016 2:21 AM
To: Yong-Geun Hong <[email protected]>
Cc: Samita Chakrabarti <[email protected]>; Pascal Thubert (pthubert) 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adoption call for 6lo Applicability and Usecases

 

Dear People,

Without the deep technical knowledge as you other people I want to give some 
feedback from the field where we today are trapped in a nightmare of standards, 
telco-standards and "standards". We work with wireless, plc and rs485, knx, 
profibus, M-bus and what have you. 

This is my first post to an IETF mailinglist so please if someone wants to 
guide me on the proper way to submit parts of this if it is not totally bogus.

 

The draft is a really nice oversight over 6lo in diverse use-cases, really nice 
as a quick reference on where to continue. We (modio) will probably make a 
flowchart thing based on this document and rfc6568 where you can put in your 
use-case and based on that get to know what could be appropriate 6lo-solutions 
instead of today's old standards and de facto standards. 

I am missing the following chapters, even though the standards are not there 
yet I feel it should be mentioned so they will not be forgotten.

6loPLC, now primarily G3-PLC and Prime, needs a chapter in 3.foo and 6.foo

LPWAN on low frequency (somewhere between 60-600 Mhz).

People are testing nowadays in Europe on the following available frequencies: 
-2.4GHz, crowded, short range, crowded, worldwide, crowded, poor penetration, 
crowded.

-868 MHz, getting crowded, only 20kHz, poor hardware support.

-433MHz (and in some countries other small bands between 398 - 465 MHz), long 
range, reliable, few channels, frequency allocations are specific to particular 
countries, 10kbit/s, still expensive modules.

27 and 40MHz HF, cheap, simple, long range, crowded, low data rates, crowded, 
large antennas needed

 

For LPWAN to succeed we need more frequencies, both public ones and private 
ones booked through your local radio frequency authority. This should be named 
in the draft and also recommendations of what type of radio to run on these 
frequencies. 

It would be nice to state in this draft that in most part of the world 174-230 
MHz VHF is more or less empty or run a very deprecated radio broadcasting 
standard which will probably be decommissioned during the next few years and 
that it would be nice to reserve a big part of it for IoT use, both public and 
bookable/buyable private channels. That would be the difference between happy 
go lucky LPWAN on existing channels and a worldwide break through for reliable 
serious applications LPWAN.

 

5 Design space:

New bullet:

Update firmware requirements: Most 6 lo uses case will need a mechanism for 
updating firmware. In these cases support for over the are updates are 
required, probably in a broadcast mode when bandwith is low and the number of 
identical devices is high.  

 

Security Requirements: (Actual text: Some 6lo use case can transfer some 
important and personal data between 6lo nodes.  In this case, high-level 
security support is required.) 
6lo will be used for important data between nodes, eventually someone will also 
know how to make today's not important data very important. High level security 
support is required. 

6.4 use case of MS/TP

I can probably write something there if interest exists.

6.6 use case of LTE MTC

Mentions LTE MTC very briefly and then talks mostly about LoRa. Mayby change 
topic.

 

Are you still with me? 

Regards, Take


-- 

Take Aanstoot

CEO 

Modio AB
+254 70 646 2344
+46 13 46 555 62

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

 

_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

Reply via email to