Hi The work is useful and I support this work to be adopted.
Regards Sajjad On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Zhangmingui (Martin) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I read the draft and found the new 6LoRH Type is useful. Support for > adoption. > > > > Thanks, > > Martin > > > > *From:* 6lo [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Gabriel > Montenegro > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2017 8:40 AM > *To:* [email protected]; Samita Chakrabarti > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [6lo] Working Group call for adoption on > draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > This document has been discussed at face to face meetings as well as on > the list. > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time/ > > > > There is some reasonable interest and an implementation in OpenWSN. Per > the last meeting, after a revision we would issue a call for adoption, and > are pursuing now. > > > > Please send your opinion (for or against) to the mailing list on adopting > this document as a 6lo WG document. This call for adoption will end at > 00:00 UTC on November 6, 2017. > > > > Regards, > > > > Chairs > > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo > >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
