+1 The Deadline-6LoRH can be very useful in some IoT scenarios. I support this work to be adopted.
Regards, Jianqiang From: sajjad akbar [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 7:46 AM To: Zhangmingui (Martin) <[email protected]> Cc: Gabriel Montenegro <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Samita Chakrabarti <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [6lo] Working Group call for adoption on draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time Hi The work is useful and I support this work to be adopted. Regards Sajjad On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Zhangmingui (Martin) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I read the draft and found the new 6LoRH Type is useful. Support for adoption. Thanks, Martin From: 6lo [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Gabriel Montenegro Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 8:40 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Samita Chakrabarti Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [6lo] Working Group call for adoption on draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time Hi Folks, This document has been discussed at face to face meetings as well as on the list. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time/ There is some reasonable interest and an implementation in OpenWSN. Per the last meeting, after a revision we would issue a call for adoption, and are pursuing now. Please send your opinion (for or against) to the mailing list on adopting this document as a 6lo WG document. This call for adoption will end at 00:00 UTC on November 6, 2017. Regards, Chairs _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
