I support adoption of this draft. The first item of work once adopted should be to clarify the relationship of this draft to the confusing PLC landscape. Section 3 mentions IEEE 1901 and G.9904, but the rest of the text doesn’t seem to discuss these forms of PLC any further. This is an editorial problem, but does extend all the way to the title of the draft.
Grüße, Carsten > On Jan 16, 2019, at 23:44, Gabriel Montenegro > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > This message initiates a 2 week call-for-adoption for: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hou-6lo-plc/ > > (currently at rev 5) > > Please send your opinion (for or against) to the mailing list on adopting > this document as a 6lo WG document. > > This call for adoption will end at 00:00 UTC on January 30, 2019. > > Regards, > > Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
