Hello Carsten, Thank you for your comment. We will revise it in the next version.
Best regards, Remy > -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 1:48 AM > To: Gabriel Montenegro > <[email protected]> > Cc: lo <[email protected]>; [email protected]; draft-hou-6lo- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [6lo] Call for adoption of draft-hou-6lo-plc > > I support adoption of this draft. > > The first item of work once adopted should be to clarify the relationship of > this draft to the confusing PLC landscape. Section 3 mentions IEEE 1901 and > G.9904, but the rest of the text doesn’t seem to discuss these forms of PLC > any further. This is an editorial problem, but does extend all the way to the > title of the draft. > > Grüße, Carsten > > > > On Jan 16, 2019, at 23:44, Gabriel Montenegro > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > This message initiates a 2 week call-for-adoption for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hou-6lo-plc/ > > > > (currently at rev 5) > > > > Please send your opinion (for or against) to the mailing list on adopting > > this > document as a 6lo WG document. > > > > This call for adoption will end at 00:00 UTC on January 30, 2019. > > > > Regards, > > > > Chairs > > > > _______________________________________________ > > 6lo mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
