Hi, draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery states in section 6.3
[the] might need to abort the process of a fragmented packet for internal > reasons, for instance if it […] considers that this packet is already fully > reassembled and passed to the upper layer. In that case, the receiver > SHOULD indicate so to the sender with a NULL bitmap in a RFRAG > Acknowledgment. The given example seems to me the perfect instance to set a FULL bitmap instead. There is no other instance were a FULL bitmap is specified to be sent, except for the case that the datagram incidentally fills out the whole value space of the sequence number field. Or am I missing something? Kind regards, Martine
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
