Hi, sadly, I did not receive an answer for this yet.
Best regards, Martine Am Di., 1. Okt. 2019 um 16:31 Uhr schrieb Martine Lenders < [email protected]>: > Hi, > > draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery states in section 6.3 > > [the] might need to abort the process of a fragmented packet for internal >> reasons, for instance if it […] considers that this packet is already fully >> reassembled and passed to the upper layer. In that case, the receiver >> SHOULD indicate so to the sender with a NULL bitmap in a RFRAG >> Acknowledgment. > > > The given example seems to me the perfect instance to set a FULL bitmap > instead. There is no other instance were a FULL bitmap is specified to be > sent, except for the case that the datagram incidentally fills out the > whole value space of the sequence number field. > > Or am I missing something? > > Kind regards, > Martine >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
