Dear Liubing. Thanks for your valuable comments. Your comments will be helpful to improve the draft. Please, see inline response.
Best regards. Yong-Geun. On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:12 AM Liubing (Remy) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Yong-Geun, > > I've reviewed the latest version of the draft, and it looks great. > > I have some editorial comments for your consideration: > > - Considering the current outline, the chapter 4 seems to be incomplete, > because it covers only the PLCs. With the title "6lo Deployment Scenarios", > it is expected to cover other low power technologies as well. Another > solution could be, moving the current text to PLC related sections, e.g. > the section 3.6 or the section 6.6. > [Yong-Geun] Yes, I agree. The main intension of the charter 4 is to illustrate and list-up practical 6lo deployment scenarios and current deployment scenarios in the charter 4 is only related to the PLC technology. In a previous version of this draft, we had a deployment scenarios of of jupitermesh and Wi-Sun but these are based on IEEE 802.15.4 specification and we had to remove jupitermesh and Wi-Sun to make narrow down the scope of this draft. I hope other experts bring another 6lo deployment scenario. If not, your suggestion could be a solution. > > - In the chapter 5, for the bullet "Mesh or L3 routing", it would be > better to have an example for mesh routing at L2, e.g. LOADng in G3 plc. > [Yong-Geun] Thanks, I will update the paragraph with your suggestion. > > Thanks again for your great efforts on the draft. > > Best regards, > Remy > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
