Then we're cool, since Murray's comment collided with one from Ben that I addressed in -13.
Many thanks to you and Murray! Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: Barry Leiba <[email protected]> > Sent: jeudi 5 mars 2020 18:29 > To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> > Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > Carles Gomez <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment- > 12: (with COMMENT) > > Hi, Pascal, > > > It seems that this is the review you made on version 10. I scanned and > could not make a difference. > > It took me a while to figure out what you were questioning, and now I > understand: you wondered why I reposted the same comments for the -12 > version as I had for the -10 version. Sorry for the confusion, but that was > just > an artifact of your posting quick updates (which I do NOT consider a > problem; I'd rather see updates posted!). The only purpose for updating my > comments, which then got attached to version -12, was to add the > comments at the bottom from Murray. I did not actually change any of my > own comments there, and, yes, I know you did address them (thanks!). > > Again, sorry for the confusion. All is good. > > Barry _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
