On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 5:52 AM Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 09:10:33AM +0200, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: > > The draft should indicated on top first page that it updates RFC6775, > > 7400, and 8505, it only shows updating RFC8505. > > The 6775 case was discussed extensively during IESG Evaluation. > Note that 8505 itself Updates 6775, and the changes in this document affect > only what 8505 does (IIRC). some new options added by this specification are discovery options and not for registrations, this draft says in the abstract that it updates 6775 and 8505, so if it is in the abstract it is mostly updating in ietf-doc relations. Best Regards AB
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
