Hello Pascal, usually when I read RFCs I like to see the updates and to remind the readers/users of standards relationships, I would not like to always have to go to IANA registrations to see their updates, I want to see IETF updates of their docs.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 2:32 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello Abdussalam: > > > > I added the suggested IANA > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-22#section-8.4 . > > I trust the IESG on the meaning of updating. > We all do trust them but just we may give reminders, > > > Stay safe, > you too, best regards AB > > > Pascal > > > > *From:* 6lo <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Abdussalam Baryun > *Sent:* lundi 27 avril 2020 14:00 > *To:* Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected]; Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert= > [email protected]>; Mohit Sethi <[email protected]>; > Rene Struik <[email protected]>; Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab) < > [email protected]>; [email protected]; Erik Kline <[email protected]>; Jim Schaad < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [6lo] AP-ND 22 > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 5:52 AM Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 09:10:33AM +0200, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: > > The draft should indicated on top first page that it updates RFC6775, > > 7400, and 8505, it only shows updating RFC8505. > > The 6775 case was discussed extensively during IESG Evaluation. > Note that 8505 itself Updates 6775, and the changes in this document affect > only what 8505 does (IIRC). I'm not sure why you want this document to > update 7400 -- it seems to just be allocating some bits from the "6LoWPAN > capability Bits" registry established by 7400. > > > > IMO it updates section 3.4 in RFC7400, it is not only adding bits, it is > adding the way of using 6CIO, we would not add bits only to add tasks in > protocols, > > > > (Well, it would be if the > IANA considerations were updated to state that, at least.) Allocating bits > from a registry is usually not seen to need an Updates relationship. > > > > yes IMO it should include also the IANA considerations > > > > best regards > > > > AB > > > > > -Ben > >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
