Hi Carles, Thanks for accommodating my comments, and for confirming.
Regards, Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Carles Gomez Montenegro <[email protected]> > Sent: 22 April 2021 11:46 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> > Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [6lo] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh- > 09: (with COMMENT) > > Hi Robert, > > Thank you very much for your feedback, and apologies for the late > response. > > We just published an updated version of the draft (revision -10). > > Please find below our inline responses to your comments: > > > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh-09: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss- > criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Hi, > > > > Thank you for this document. > > > > A couple of minor comments relating to the diagram in 3.2 (figure 2): > > > > (1) It wasn't clear to me why the top left node was a 6LR rather than a > > 6LN. > > If this is deliberate, it might be worth a sentence to explain the > purpose > > here. > > This was actually deliberate, to show that such scenario may occur and it > is supported. > > As per your suggestion, we added a sentence in the paragraph after Figure > 2, as follows: > > NEW: > Note that, in some scenarios, and/or for some time intervals, a 6LR may > remain at the edge of the network (e.g. the top left node in Figure 2). > This may happen when a 6LR has no neighboring 6LNs. > > > (2) I initially found the bubble around the v6 Mesh to be confusing > > - I > > thought that it means that all the nodes are interconnected. I'm not > sure > > whether the bubble really helps the diagram, and probably could be > > removed, of > > if it is kept, I would suggest adding more space between the bubble line > > and > > the mesh network inside so that the bubble line isn't confused as > > representing > > links between the nodes. > > As per your suggestion, we removed the bubble for greater clarity. > > Thanks, > > Carles (on behalf of the authors) > > > > Regards, > > Rob > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > 6lo mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo > > > _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
