Dear Chairs and all,
Thanks chairs and minutes takers. Maybe it's fault of my pronunciation, I don't
think we discussed any topic about security. If I remembered, in that time we
discussed constrained devices and more general case, which one is the typical
use cases of APL. Maybe we should correct the following lines a bit.
[11:40] Native Short Address for LLN Expansion (Luigi Iannone ) 15 min
goes through changes since IETF112
applicability mostly in static deployment, otherwise, need to renumber.
next: will try to evaluate gain with this approach; will respond to latest
comments.
then will consider asking for adoption
Carles: draft states applicability for static deployment of wired
technologies. PLC?
Luigi: some others, will do literature review
Guangpeng: PLC, also APL (Advanced Physical Layer) which is extension of
802.3cg
> Carles: other additions needed to the draft?
> Guangpeng: security
Peng Liu: support this work
Thanks,
Guangpeng Li
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6lo <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Carles Gomez Montenegro
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2022 4:57 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [6lo] Initial version of the minutes from 6lo at IETF 113
>
> Dear all,
>
> The initial version of the minutes from the 6lo session at IETF 113 has been
> published:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/minutes-113-6lo-00.txt
>
> Many thanks to Dominique, Adnan and Michael for the excellent
> minute-taking!
>
> Also, many thanks to all participants for the productive session and
> discussions.
>
> Should you identify anything that might need to be corrected from the
> minutes, please let us know.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Shwetha and Carles
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
