Dear Guangpeng,
Thanks for your message!
You are right.
After double checking the recording, we have updated the minutes as follows:
OLD:
Carles: other additions needed to the draft?
Guangpeng: security
NEW:
Carles: is this technology for constrained devices?
Guangpeng: used in industrial equipment
The new version of the minutes can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/minutes-113-6lo-01.txt
Should you have further comments, please do not hesitate to let us know.
Cheers,
Shwetha and Carles
> Dear Chairs and all,
>
> Thanks chairs and minutes takers. Maybe it's fault of my pronunciation, I
> don't think we discussed any topic about security. If I remembered, in
> that time we discussed constrained devices and more general case, which
> one is the typical use cases of APL. Maybe we should correct the following
> lines a bit.
>
> [11:40] Native Short Address for LLN Expansion (Luigi Iannone ) 15 min
>
> goes through changes since IETF112
> applicability mostly in static deployment, otherwise, need to
> renumber.
> next: will try to evaluate gain with this approach; will respond to
> latest comments.
> then will consider asking for adoption
> Carles: draft states applicability for static deployment of wired
> technologies. PLC?
> Luigi: some others, will do literature review
> Guangpeng: PLC, also APL (Advanced Physical Layer) which is extension
> of 802.3cg
>> Carles: other additions needed to the draft?
>> Guangpeng: security
> Peng Liu: support this work
>
> Thanks,
> Guangpeng Li
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
