Hi Eric, Thanks for comments again. I spoke with Pascal to handle further comments. He will upload the updated draft. I might not be available until next week.
Have a nice long weekend. Regards, AR On Thu, Apr 17, 2025, 23:14 Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Adnan, > > > > Thank you for the update, no problem is the authors want to keep section > 2. It also seem that you do not agree with citing ‘this RFC’ in addition to > RFC 8928 in the IANA considerations, again up to the authors. > > > > Section, I did not see the definition of the P-field in -00, but it is now > in your editor’s copy, so all is good. > > > > Some typos though: s/two bit field/two-bit field/ and “refernce” ;-) > > > > Missing subject in `however, fails to register its position with IANA` ? > > > > Regards > > > > -éric > > > > *From: *Adnan Rashid <[email protected]> > *Date: *Thursday, 17 April 2025 at 17:50 > *To: *Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]>, Pascal > Thubert <[email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *[6lo] Re: Call for adoption of draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928 > > Hi Eric, > > > > All done except few. My comments are inline > > > > · Section 2: (perhaps extreme also) can be completely removed, i.e., > there is no need to explain what EARO is > > *Adnan: * My suggestion is not to remove the all EARO flags field. Rest I > agree. > > > > · Section 3: add a reference where the P-field is defined > > *Adnan:* Already added or I might be not getting you where exactly you > are pointing. > > > > > > See the changes in the attached file. > > > > @Pascal Thubert <[email protected]> please check the changes and > upload the draft. > > > > Tthanks and happy holidays. > > *From: *Carles Gomez Montenegro <[email protected]> > *Date: *Tuesday, 15 April 2025 at 09:52 > *To: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *[6lo] Re: Call for adoption of draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928 > > Apologies, we meant that the call for adoption will end on the 22nd of > *April*, EOB. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Shwetha and Carles > > > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 09:46, Carles Gomez Montenegro < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Dear 6lo WG, > > This message starts a call for WG adoption of > draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928-00. > > (Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928) > > > This document aims to fix a mistake with the C flag in EARO in RFC 8928. > > As this is a short document, the call will end on the 22nd of May, EOB. > > > > Please state whether you are in favor of adopting this document. > > > > Also, comments and reviews of the document will be very much appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Shwetha and Carles > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Adnan >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
