> > I support the call for adoption as this fixes the IANA allocation > conflict. > Thanks Shwetha
> *From: *Carles Gomez Montenegro <[email protected]> > > *Date: *Monday, 21 April 2025 at 07:35 > *To: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *[6lo] Re: Call for adoption of draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928 > > Dear 6lo WG, > > > > Please recall that the call for WG adoption of > draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928-00 will end on the 22nd of April, EOB. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Shwetha and Carles > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 09:52, Carles Gomez Montenegro < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Apologies, we meant that the call for adoption will end on the 22nd of > *April*, EOB. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Shwetha and Carles > > > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 09:46, Carles Gomez Montenegro < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Dear 6lo WG, > > This message starts a call for WG adoption of > draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928-00. > > (Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928) > > > This document aims to fix a mistake with the C flag in EARO in RFC 8928. > > As this is a short document, the call will end on the 22nd of May, EOB. > > > > Please state whether you are in favor of adopting this document. > > > > Also, comments and reviews of the document will be very much appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Shwetha and Carles > > > >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
