Mahesh Jethanandani has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It is unusual, but I find this statement under the ballot text.

"This document has not completed IETF Last Call. Please do not issue the ballot
early without good reason.

This document is in an IESG state of "In Last Call". It would be unexpected to
issue a ballot while in this state".

I know the document is short, and is a quick fix, but is this expected?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NIT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
did with these suggestions.

Section 2.2, paragraph 0
>    This document uses terms and concepts that are discussed in Neighbor
>    Discovery (ND) for IPv6 [RFC4861], [RFC4862] and Subnet ND [RFC6775],
>    [RFC8505] [RFC8928], [RFC8929] [RFC9685], and
>    [I-D.ietf-6lo-prefix-registration].

One too many ands in the statement. Maybe:
s/[RFC4682] and Subnet ND/[RFC4682], Subnet ND/

Reference entries duplicated in both normative and informative sections:
[RFC8929].

Uncited references: [RFC4861], [RFC6775], [RFC4862], and [RFC8929].



_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to