Kerry Lynn <[email protected]> wrote: > I have submitted this I-D in order to update RFC 8163 to reflect the name > change of the underlying MS/TP data link in the ASHRAE BACnet standard. I > have also updated references and incorporated the one errata that was > reported.
Cool.
> The differences mainly are to do with terminology, with the exception of
> fixing the errata. It may be the case that there's a better way to make
the
> requisite changes to the RFC but we can discuss this in the meeting.
Please
> let me know if you have any questions.
Could this document go to Internet Standard?
Maybe you want to name this rfc8163bis somewhere in the name?
A trick/bug in the DT is that you can't easily diff against RFCs, but you can
diff
against the last I-D:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-08&doc_2=draft-lynn-6lo-6lobac-bis-00&iddiff=1
I would prefer a 6lo-rfc8163bis-00 that was identical to the RFC,
and then a -01 that has your changes.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
