Hi Vipul, --- Vipul Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > So it seems to me that including the source explicitly > (like the destination) is the best option. And that one > should use short addresses to minimize the addressing > overhead.
I am convinced of this as well. In the note I added, I say so, although it was not clear. I think for the upcoming rev we should add that original source field, yes. Any objections? -gabriel _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
