On Oct 18, 2005, at 11:41 AM, gabriel montenegro wrote:
--- Vipul Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The way I understand the current draft at:
http://www.geocities.com/gabriel_montenegro_2000/draft-ietf-6lowpan-
format-00a.htm
the final destination info (which is needed to look
up the next hop at each intermediate point in the path) is only
carried in the first fragment. Is this correct or just a
misunderstanding
on my part?
The latter. If you look at the packet formats:
That's good to know.
Perhaps the draft could be made clearer in this respect. In particular,
I misunderstood this part in Section 9.2
"This implies that the "Final Destination" field will immediately
follow an unfragmented packet as per Figure 1 (i.e., preceding the IPv6
Header), or immediately following the first fragment header as per
Figure 2."
as precluding the inclusion of the "Final Destination" in fragments
other than the first.
vipul
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
