Sorry for the late feedback.

As Daniel said, good job Nandu and Gab.

However, I have the following nitpicks: 

Section: 2. Overview
Possibly missing a linespace between bullet 9. and 10.

Section: 4.2. Topologies
Last sentence in this section: 
 "This, or course..." 
should probably be
 "This, of course"

Section: 4.4. Limited configuration and management
Last sentence in this section: 
 "...yet be powerful to control dense..."
I suggest maybe to add "enough" between "powerful" and "to".

Section: 4.6. Security
Last sentence in this section:
 "Please refer to security consideration section below for an in depth
requirements for security"
I suggest change to:
 "Please refer to the security considerations section below
   for in depth security requirements."

Section: 5. Goals (Page 7-8):

I think the reader would gain a better understanding of the goals for
6lowpan if we start each goal with a clear definition (one-sentence) of
the goal, then followed by the related background information. The goals
appear more or less hidden in the text in its current form. This is
especially true for goal nr. 2, which is mostly background information
until at the end it is stated "this goal needs to investigate using
existing header compression... ". 
I also think the usage of word goal in goals 2 and 3 are confusing.
Examples:
"...this goal needs to investigate..." (Goal nr. 2)
"The goal should specify a method..." (Goal nr. 3)
It is we (the working group) not the goal , which needs to investigate
and to specify. Correct me, if I'm reading it wrong.


Overall I think the document is good, and I believe if you incorporate
my nits on the goals section, then it is IESG ready. 

Again, excellent work. :-)

Regards
Christian



-----Original Message-----
From: Kushalnagar, Nandakishore
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 7. marts 2006 01:45
To: Soohong Daniel Park; Geoff Mulligan; 6lowpan
Subject: RE: [6lowpan] Working group last-call on problems document

Thanks Daniel.

Once all the comments are in, we will do a final walk through to clarify
these inconsistencies.

Regards
Nandu

-----Original Message-----
From: Soohong Daniel Park [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:01 PM
To: Geoff Mulligan; 6lowpan
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Working group last-call on problems document

I believe it is ready to the IESG. Good job Nandu and Gab...:-)

Minor nits: both LoWPAN and 6LoWPAN seem a bit confused
around the document. If available, defining terminology would
be favorable.

Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Geoff Mulligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "6lowpan" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:12 AM
Subject: [6lowpan] Working group last-call on problems document


> Hi,
> This note starts the 6loWPAN Working Group Last-call for comments on
> draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem-02.txt, "6LoWPAN: Overview, Assumptions,
> Problem Statement and Goals".  The document can be found at
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem-02.txt
> 
> Please review the document carefully, and send your feedback to the
> list.  Please also indicate whether or not you believe that this
> document is ready to go to the IESG.
> 
> This Last Call will end on 20 March 2006 at 0900 MST (UTC - 7), two
> weeks form the time of this call.
> 
> Thanks,
> geoff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> 
>

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to