Ian,
You said:
"I still believe that DYMO is more appropriate for 6lowpan, it should
require few if any modifications to run in 6lowpan networks."
I'd like to understand the tradeoff here:
DYMO
- supposedly improved. how? what are the advantages over AODV? is it really very
different?
- slated for proposed standard. when?
AODV
- de facto standard adopted in modified form by these other groups:
- zigbee - as explained to me during an open house, they use a modified form
of AODV (among other mesh solutions)
- 802.11s: after something like 15 proposals, the recently chosen basis for
the
group's work uses a modified form of AODV with OLSR as optional.
It is attractive to align with the above groups, so DYMO should be sufficiently
better so as to offset ths. Could you help me better understand the relative
merits of aodv versus dymo?
thanks,
-gabriel
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
