> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:58:04 -0800 (PST)
> From: gabriel montenegro
> Subject: Re: [6lowpan] LOAD Updated
>
> Ian said:
>
> > "I still believe that DYMO is more appropriate for 6lowpan, it should
> > require few if any modifications to run in 6lowpan networks."
>
> I'd like to understand the tradeoff here:
>
> DYMO
> - supposedly improved. how? what are the advantages over AODV?
> is it really very different?
> - slated for proposed standard. when?
> [...]
The short answer is that DYMO is the next-generation reactive ad hoc
routing protocol being developed within the MANET working group:
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/manet-charter.html
It arguably embodies the lessons learned from the development of
the previous iteration of protocols developed in the MANET
working group, including AODV. This week's DYMO presentation
is available:
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06mar/slides/manet-0.pdf
-tjs
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
