Hi Wassim, Thanks your point.
In principle, I doubt that SeND (and even OptiSeND) can be applied for 6lowpan environment, we need further study in the next version though. 6lowpan node is more power/resourse sensitive than you are referring to OptiSeND nodes in your proposal. I don't have a clear answer on that at this stage, so we am focusing on *analysis* first, not *solution*. Anyway, I will refer to your effort, and appreciate if you have more comments on NDP security analysis in conjunction with 6lowpan. Regards. Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wassim Haddad (KI/EAB)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]>; "Wassim Haddad (KI/EAB)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 1:25 AM Subject: [6lowpan] Fw: I-DACTION:draft-daniel-6lowpan-security-analysis-01.txt Hi Daniel, You may be interested in taking a look to the ongoing work on Optimizing the SEND protocol: draft-haddad-mipshop-optisend-01 Regards, Wassim H. >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > Title : IPv6 over Low Power WPAN Security Analysis > Author(s) : S. Park, et al. > >Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) >Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
