Hi Daniel, On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Soohong Daniel Park wrote:
> Thanks your point. > > In principle, I doubt that SeND (and even OptiSeND) > can be applied for 6lowpan environment, we need > further study in the next version though. => I agree with you that SEND is unusable (too heavy for even "normal" small mobile devices) but am not sure about your comment on OptiSEND. In fact, the One-way hash chains and symmetric keys (which are the main features in OptiSEND) are considered cheap enough to be used to authenticate messages in these environments. > 6lowpan node is more power/resourse sensitive than you are > referring to OptiSeND nodes in your proposal. => Can you please elaborate more on what you mean by "more"? > Anyway, I will refer to your effort, and appreciate > if you have more comments on NDP security analysis > in conjunction with 6lowpan. => OK thanks. Regards, Wassim H. _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
