On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Kris Pister wrote:
JP - the RL2N charter looks good. My only concern is over the second L in L2 - are these networks intrinsically lossy, or is that just due to the current protocols?
The "lossy" means at the link layer. There aren't any wireless link layers that don't have losses. They might mask them to higher layers through retransmissions, but losses occur. Of course, a network layer may select links that have a very low loss rate, but, well, that's part of what all of this effort is about.
Phil _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
