Hi, Just a suggestion for the chairs and the WG.
We have discussed many important items for 6lowpan. For several of them, all important, I think that there was a clear agreement: statefull header compression, security, Architecture ID, fragmentation, ..... For other ones such as the ³Mesh-under² and ³Route over² discussion, there are diverging point of views. So why not trying to quickly re-charter adding the items for which there is a consensus and continue the discussion on the open issues in the meantime until we have an agreement at which point the WG may re-charter ? As we all know, the WG has been fairly slow in term of progress and it is I think now urgent to move on. Thoughts ? Thanks. JP.
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
