+ 1 -- Soohong Daniel Park [at] Samsung Electronics Standard Architect, http://blog.naver.com/natpt
On 5/30/08, JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > *Just a suggestion* for the chairs and the WG. > > We have discussed many important items for 6lowpan. > > For several of them, all important, I think that there was a clear > agreement: statefull header compression, security, Architecture ID, > fragmentation, ..... For other ones such as the "Mesh-under" and "Route > over" discussion, there are diverging point of views. > > So why not trying to quickly re-charter adding the items for which there is > a consensus and continue the discussion on the open issues in the meantime > until we have an agreement at which point the WG may re-charter ? > > As we all know, the WG has been fairly slow in term of progress and it is I > think now urgent to move on. > > Thoughts ? > > Thanks. > > JP. > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > >
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
