Geoff, 6LoWPAN use-case was always in the recharter items, and there was no objection on it. Any reason to take it out? Thanks for the good work.
-eunah On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Geoff Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After reviewing the comments on the list and talking with Carsten and > Mark, we have come up with the following text for the Charter. > > We hope (and think) that this reflects the input from the group and Mark > plans to take this to the IESG for rechartering approval. > > We've had some excellent discussion on a few topics and this is great. > There is no reason why we should stop the discussion and work while Mark > handles the rechartering. > > 1. I think that the work is proceeding on the Security Analysis document > 2. We have the current HC1G draft. The issue being discussed is the > "compression" of the UDP checksum and it's impact on the end-to-end > model. I would like to hear more input and discussion on this. Please > speak up if you have thoughts on this. > 3. We have some initial input on the Architecture document and I would > like to hear from anyone that would volunteer to continue to work on > this document. > > geoff > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
