I have no problem with the WG having an informational use-case work item 
in its charter. We have to understand that use-cases cannot cover the 
entire spectrum of how a protocol may get used, but can provide a 
general understanding and lay the groundwork for certain boundaries and 
requirements.

- Mark

JP Vasseur wrote:
> Same question.
>
>
> On 6/12/08 3:49 AM, "Eunsook "Eunah" Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>> Geoff,
>>
>> 6LoWPAN use-case was always in the recharter items, and there was no
>> objection on it. Any reason to take it out?
>> Thanks for the good work.
>>
>> -eunah
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Geoff Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>     
>>> After reviewing the comments on the list and talking with Carsten and
>>> Mark, we have come up with the following text for the Charter.
>>>
>>> We hope (and think) that this reflects the input from the group and Mark
>>> plans to take this to the IESG for rechartering approval.
>>>
>>> We've had some excellent discussion on a few topics and this is great.
>>> There is no reason why we should stop the discussion and work while Mark
>>> handles the rechartering.
>>>
>>> 1. I think that the work is proceeding on the Security Analysis document
>>> 2. We have the current HC1G draft.  The issue being discussed is the
>>> "compression" of the UDP checksum and it's impact on the end-to-end
>>> model.  I would like to hear more input and discussion on this.  Please
>>> speak up if you have thoughts on this.
>>> 3. We have some initial input on the Architecture document and I would
>>> like to hear from anyone that would volunteer to continue to work on
>>> this document.
>>>
>>>        geoff
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 6lowpan mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6lowpan mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>
>   

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to