So at least can we agree to (1) Have "some" high level text in the architecture ID (2) A separate ID dealing with the subject and used to draw a consensus.
On 6/16/08 7:06 PM, "Samita Chakrabarti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Geoff, Other folks and myself already respond to the following > question before in the mailing list. > Should we remove the text about > mesh-under and route-over? > IMHO, the answer is no. The discussion of > mesh-under and route-over concepts with respect to IPv6-over-802.15.4 network > is important for folks to understand the over-all picture. > Should we leave > the text as it is? > Yes, > please. Thanks. -Samita _______________________________________________ 6low > pan mailing > list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
