So then can we agree that the charter text can stand as it was sent out
on 13 June.
Anyone not agreeing?
geoff
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 16:55 +0200, JP Vasseur wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
>
> On 6/16/08 9:22 PM, "Carsten Bormann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 16 2008, at 19:43, JP Vasseur wrote:
> >
> >> (2) A separate ID dealing with the subject and used to draw a
> >> consensus.
> >
> >
> > (Assuming you mean on the question of L2 forwarding yes [mesh-under]
> > or no [route-over]:)
> >
> > As I said, I'm not sure we are even getting any closer to a consensus.
> > Why should the WG try to make that decision? Why now? (This is not
> > just a rethorical question!)
>
> Just because it may not be a bad idea to close on this if you do not want
> this topic to pop again in a few month but if you think that this is not
> necessary, fine ...
>
> JP.
>
> >
> > Gruesse, Carsten
> >
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
