David and Gil, Is there any possibility of working with the Zigbee Alliance to allow alternate networking (namely 6lowpan) underneath the Zigbee Application Protocol in future revisions of the Zigbee Specification? This would be the biggest win for customers, since the IETF informational draft you sent describes a fork of the Zigbee Specification. While technically this makes quite a bit of sense, it will only add additional confusion to multitude of networking options that customers and integrators are struggling to understand.
-Joe On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Kris Pister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice. The beginning of the end for the Zigbee network stack. Few will > mourn it's passing. > > ksjp > > David Culler wrote: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tolle-cap-00 > > ________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
