Hi Joe,
The draft is there to get people thinking about a way to use IP as a
technical solution to some of the interoperability issues that are
arising in the space. If folks in the ZigBee Alliance are interested
in including the idea in their specification, I'd be happy to work
with the them.
Gil
On Oct 9, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Joe Polastre wrote:
David and Gil,
Is there any possibility of working with the Zigbee Alliance to
allow alternate networking (namely 6lowpan) underneath the Zigbee
Application Protocol in future revisions of the Zigbee Specification?
This would be the biggest win for customers, since the IETF
informational draft you sent describes a fork of the Zigbee
Specification. While technically this makes quite a bit of sense, it
will only add additional confusion to multitude of networking options
that customers and integrators are struggling to understand.
-Joe
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Kris Pister
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice. The beginning of the end for the Zigbee network stack. Few
will
mourn it's passing.
ksjp
David Culler wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tolle-cap-00
________________________________
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
