Hi Zach,

On Oct 10, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Zach Shelby wrote:
Here are my comments on hc-01. Overall I think we are quite close with the comments from Pascal and Julien.

I found the DDF name confusing. Now it has been renamed CTX in the latest formats on the list, great.

As Pascal pointed out, nodes need to be able to decode all these options. One thing that worries me in having 16 contexts, is that nodes are forced to store them all. That is worst case 272 bytes of memory consumption. Worth it? Is it possible that an ultra-simple node would only have to understand the default context?

[jhui] The number of contexts is an issue I raised on the list a few weeks ago. Many seemed to think that two contexts was okay. However, I wanted us to be sure that 2 was enough and as a result there was no change in the number of contexts from hc-00 to hc-01. With an extra bit (13 bits total) we can certainly support 2 contexts without a context identifier extension. With two extra bits (14 bits) we can support 3 contexts. Any more would require an extra byte, I think. Of course, we can stick with the current encoding but we can limit use to X < 16 contexts. What do people think?

The default context identifier '0000' could be clarified more in the draft. When CTX is '10' then the default context identifier '0000' is used. It should be made clear that this is the prefix advertised in RAs as useable for SAA.


Regarding the ND for 6lowpan draft, HC-01 means we need to add a 4- bit context identifier flag to the 6LoWPAN Prefix Information Option. To make things clear that should always be '0000' if the A flag is '1'?

[jhui] Those that are arguing for more than 2 contexts see it useful for renumbering. If that is the case, then SAA must have the flexibility for use with contexts other than the default. For now, I think it's best to consider having a context identifier included with the 6LoWPAN Prefix Information Option.

--
Jonathan Hui



- Zach


Jonathan Hui wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc
This new version reflects the recent discussions on the list. The changes are: - HC back to 1 byte by default by stealing a few bits from the dispatch field.
- Added better support for multicast address compression.
- Fixed alignment for UDP port compression.
- Better support for Traffic Class and Flow Label compression.
- Pascal joined as an author.
Happy reading!
--
Jonathan Hui
Begin forwarded message:
From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: October 8, 2008 7:15:35 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-01


A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-01.txt has been successfuly submitted by Jonathan Hui and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename:     draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc
Revision:     01
Title: Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams in 6LoWPAN Networks
Creation_date:     2008-10-09
WG ID:         6lowpan
Number_of_pages: 15

Abstract:
This document specifies an IPv6 header compression format for IPv6
packet delivery in 6LoWPAN networks.  The compression format relies
on shared context to allow compression of arbitrary prefixes.  This
document specifies compression of multicast addresses and a framework
for compressing next headers.  This framework specifies UDP
compression and is prepared for additional transports.



The IETF Secretariat.


_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

--

Zach Shelby
Head of Research
Sensinode Ltd.
Kidekuja 2
88610 Vuokatti
FINLAND

mobile: +358 40 7796297

This e-mail and all attached material are confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail from your system without producing, distributing or retaining copies thereof.

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to