On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 01:09 +0300, Mikko Saarnivala wrote: > I couldn't agree more with Zach's and Carsten's comments about > RFC4861 > being link-specific. And don't get me wrong nd-06 still might have > some > problems as Jonathan pointed out - those problems obviously have to > be > sorted out.
So if there are still problems we shouldn't use a WGLC to sort them out. _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
