On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 01:09 +0300, Mikko Saarnivala wrote:
> From a practical experience: using a 6lowpan 802.15.4 interface
> connected to a PC with the v6 stack of the PC _does not_ require any
> changes to the PC v6 stack. A very small amount of extra code on a
> USB
> dongle itself or a small user-space application will suffice. We know
> for a fact that this is a) simple and b) it works just great so I
> hope
> that you can understand why I actually don't see any good reason for
> using RFC4861 ND _at all_ in 6lowpan networks.
And from practical experience I do see a use for 4861 in 6lowpan
networks.
geoff
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
