Hi Geoff, I do not support forwarding this doc to IESG yet. I would like the following issues addressed
** Investigate possible TCP header compression scheme ** Explain strategy for compressing RPL headers ( I understand this could be done in the ROLL group, but I have not seen a definite statement either way ) ** Resolve the "forward compatability" issue ( ideally, while maintaining backwards-comptability ) -Regards, Joseph ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:56:31 -0700 From: Geoff Mulligan <[email protected]> Subject: [6lowpan] WGLC for 6lowpan HC draft To: 6lowpan <[email protected]> Message-ID: <1266047791.3643.48.ca...@dellx1> Content-Type: text/plain Folks, I realized that I have made a huge slip-up. The HC draft has languished for the past few months. At the meeting in Hiroshima we said that we would last call this draft, but I failed to send out the actual last call. So... This note formally starts the WG Last Call for comments on draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06, "Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams in 6LoWPAN Networks". The document can be found at: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06.txt The document is intended to be submitted by this Working Group to the IESG for publication as a Standards Track document. Please review the document carefully (one last time), and send your comments to the 6lowpan list. Please also indicate in your response whether or not you think this document is ready to go to the IESG. Because of my gaffe this Last Call will end Wednesday February 24 2010 at 2359 UTC. Thanks, Geoff ************************************** _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
