Hi Geoff, There was also the issue of using PAN-ID's with 16-bit compressed addresses. I think we almost reached a consensus on the mailing list there too, but I don't think there was a final statement of what to do.
-Colin -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Geoff Mulligan Sent: March 12, 2010 7:54 AM To: 6lowpan Subject: [6lowpan] agenda items so far the only person that has replied to be was Erik to talk about the nd-simple draft. Do we think that we have reached consensus on the HC draft. Should we move forward with the plan to just explicitly state that compression can only be used in first fragment? If we think that we have consensus on the issue we do not need to talk about it at the meeting. Are there other topics for this meeting other than ND? Draft agendas were due two days ago... Thanks, geoff _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
