Great! I'll add it to the agenda.
geoff
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 07:57 -0800, Jonathan Hui wrote:
> I can do that.
>
> --
> Jonathan Hui
>
> On Mar 12, 2010, at 7:41 AM, Geoff Mulligan wrote:
>
> > Colin,
> > Good point. Is there anyone that wants to put together a short
> > presentation on the issue with the current spec in 4944 and the
> > proposed
> > alternative(s).
> >
> > geoff
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 08:55 +0000, Colin O'Flynn wrote:
> >> Hi Geoff,
> >>
> >> There was also the issue of using PAN-ID's with 16-bit compressed
> >> addresses.
> >> I think we almost reached a consensus on the mailing list there
> >> too, but I
> >> don't think there was a final statement of what to do.
> >>
> >> -Colin
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> >> Behalf
> >> Of Geoff Mulligan
> >> Sent: March 12, 2010 7:54 AM
> >> To: 6lowpan
> >> Subject: [6lowpan] agenda items
> >>
> >> so far the only person that has replied to be was Erik to talk
> >> about the
> >> nd-simple draft.
> >>
> >> Do we think that we have reached consensus on the HC draft. Should
> >> we
> >> move forward with the plan to just explicitly state that
> >> compression can
> >> only be used in first fragment? If we think that we have consensus
> >> on
> >> the issue we do not need to talk about it at the meeting.
> >>
> >> Are there other topics for this meeting other than ND?
> >>
> >> Draft agendas were due two days ago...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> geoff
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> 6lowpan mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 6lowpan mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
