This document is well done, and I believe it's ready for moving forward.

I second.


Daniel



>
> >
> > On 07/28/10 22:52, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> >>
> >> LoWPANners,
> >>
> >> as you know, the working group chairs dropped the ball on the usecases
> >> document.
> >> A version with fixes resulting from the WGLC issued on 2009-01-09 was
> >> submitted on 2009-10-02. We wanted to get some quick feedback on
> >> whether that was fixing the issues and then never actually issued the
> >> second working-group last call.  Indeed, the Internet-Draft expired
> >> after six months...  Then the terminology of the ND draft changed.
> >> Since the usecases draft now has been resubmitted with updated
> >> terminology:
> >>
> >> This is a Working-Group Last-Call for:
> >>
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-06
> >>
> >> The document is intended to be submitted by this Working Group to the
> >> IESG for publication as an Informational Document.
> >>
> >> This is a one-week Working-Group Last-Call, ending on 2010-08-09
> >> (Monday, August 09, 2010) at 2359 UTC.
> >>
> >> Please review the document carefully (one last time), and send your
> >> comments to the 6lowpan list.  Please also indicate in your response
> >> whether or not you think this document is ready to go to the IESG.
> >>
> >> Carsten and Geoff
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> 6lowpan mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>



-- 
Soohong Daniel Park
http://www.soohongp.com
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to