Pascal,
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 13:09 +0100, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> Hi Geoff:
> 
> I think that the chairs also had the task to conclude with the ML
> whether we'd do the work on Backbone Router and on Fragment recovery in
> this group or not.

That was not my recollection, so I will defer to Carsten.
But anyone else that would like to weigh in on these two topics:
  Backbone Router
  Fragment Recovery

> I think the former at least does not require re-chartering since it used
> to be part of a WG doc. Yet, I have not seen that decision being made.
> Could you please trigger those threads?
> As a more generic item, do you envision re-chartering at all to take new
> work aboard?

I thought that was part of the my question to the WG?

        geoff
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Pascal
> http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/7011357/
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> > Behalf Of Geoff Mulligan
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 12:20 AM
> > To: 6lowpan
> > Subject: [6lowpan] agenda for upcoming IETF
> > 
> > As you all should know the 6lowpan WG meeting is currently scheduled
> for
> > Tuesday afternoon 1520-1700 and we are looking for agenda items.
> > 
> > There has been little or no discussion on our mailing list since the
> last IETF
> > meeting.
> > 
> > Hopefully the ND and HC drafts are basically complete.  The Use Case
> and
> > Routing Requirements drafts are moving forward.
> > 
> > At the last meeting the other topic that seemed to have some traction
> in the
> > WG was working on other header compression techniques.  We have two
> > different drafts on this topic: Carsten's generic header compression
> and
> > Colin's ICMP header compression.
> > 
> > The other topic that hotly discussed atwas whether the group should
> work
> > on Mesh Under.
> > 
> > Again we have had no discussion on our list about any of these topics.
> > 
> > Besides the drafts from Carsten and Colin, we have had another draft
> on
> > global address compression.
> > 
> > The meta topic we need to discuss both at the meeting and on this list
> -
> > Should we call it quits or should we recharter?
> > 
> > Input???
> > 
> >     geoff
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > 6lowpan mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan


_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to