Hi Geoff I would support further work on header compression and also Mesh Under in the working group. We have successfully deployed commercial mesh-under IP-based networks using a proprietary mesh protocol Operating on the 15.4 link layer and would be interested in sharing our experiences and working with others on this topic I am also interested in improving fragmentation behaviour so I would like to see work in this area Paul
Paul Chilton Low Power RF Solutions (formerly Jennic) NXP Semiconductors www.nxp.com/jennic -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Geoff Mulligan Sent: 28 February 2011 23:20 To: 6lowpan Subject: [6lowpan] agenda for upcoming IETF As you all should know the 6lowpan WG meeting is currently scheduled for Tuesday afternoon 1520-1700 and we are looking for agenda items. There has been little or no discussion on our mailing list since the last IETF meeting. Hopefully the ND and HC drafts are basically complete. The Use Case and Routing Requirements drafts are moving forward. At the last meeting the other topic that seemed to have some traction in the WG was working on other header compression techniques. We have two different drafts on this topic: Carsten's generic header compression and Colin's ICMP header compression. The other topic that hotly discussed atwas whether the group should work on Mesh Under. Again we have had no discussion on our list about any of these topics. Besides the drafts from Carsten and Colin, we have had another draft on global address compression. The meta topic we need to discuss both at the meeting and on this list - Should we call it quits or should we recharter? Input??? geoff _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
