As a side note,
I wonder why people prefer to work for IPv6 over BT-LE
instead of IPv6 over ANT+
?
ANT+ is a very low power link layer technology very well adapted for the
scenario depicted in the bt-le use case scenario (page 50 of
http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/80/slides/6lowpan-0.pdf)
BT-LE and ANT+ technologies seem to compete in a certain market segment
related to PAN.
I am asking because, from where I look, IMHO, ANT+ does seem to get some
tract among manufacturers of these devices.
Alex
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
