That was a side note.
Please do not call my points 0-value.
One would be tempted to easily discard some points of doing work without
meetings as of questionable value as well. But try to understand before
discarding.
Alex
Le 02/04/2011 02:11, [email protected] a écrit :
Alex,
Do you really have a point to make in this discussion? You are all
over the map with zero value.
-Raj
On 4/1/11 4:45 PM, "ext Alexandru
Petrescu"<[email protected]> wrote:
As a side note,
I wonder why people prefer to work for IPv6 over BT-LE instead of
IPv6 over ANT+ ?
ANT+ is a very low power link layer technology very well adapted
for the scenario depicted in the bt-le use case scenario (page 50
of http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/80/slides/6lowpan-0.pdf)
BT-LE and ANT+ technologies seem to compete in a certain market
segment related to PAN.
I am asking because, from where I look, IMHO, ANT+ does seem to
get some tract among manufacturers of these devices.
Alex _______________________________________________ 6lowpan
mailing list [email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
