hi all,

+1.

I support BT-LE should be adopted by WG.

-- 
Wang Feng. Shawn


>It appears I was a bit quick dismissing BT-LE as a working group item during 
>Tuesday's 6LoWPAN meeting.  The WG is alive and >well, so we can very well 
>request the addition of milestones.  As the support in the room for working on 
>the adaptation of 6LoWPAN >for BT-LE was quite good, I'm now issuing a call 
>for WG adoption.

>This is a call for working group adoption of
>draft-patil-6lowpan-v6over-btle-01.txt

>Working group adoption does not mean we agree with every detail of the
>draft, but that we want to use it as the basis of further working group
>work.

>Please reply to the list until

>       Friday, April 8, 23:59 UTC

> with your position whether this document should be adopted or not.

> Gruesse, Carsten
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to