+1 > Re: [6lowpan] WG adoption of 6lowpan Implementers guide
That's what you get when you edit one message out of another. It's been a long week... Of course, this is about the BT-LE draft, not about the implementers guide. Please make sure you reply with the subject of this message, in particular if it is just a "+1"... Sorry for the confusion, Carsten On Mar 31, 2011, at 19:47, Carsten Bormann wrote: > It appears I was a bit quick dismissing BT-LE as a working group item during > Tuesday's 6LoWPAN meeting. The WG is alive and well, so we can very well > request the addition of milestones. As the support in the room for working > on the adaptation of 6LoWPAN for BT-LE was quite good, I'm now issuing a call > for WG adoption. > > This is a call for working group adoption of > draft-patil-6lowpan-v6over-btle-01.txt > > Working group adoption does not mean we agree with every detail of the > draft, but that we want to use it as the basis of further working group > work. > > Please reply to the list until > > Friday, April 8, 23:59 UTC > > with your position whether this document should be adopted or not. > > Gruesse, Carsten
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
