On Apr 1, 2011, at 19:40, Oliver Hahm wrote: > Therefore, a more generic specification for IPv6 over low-power wireless foo > would be really interesting for us - and probably a lot of other people as > CC1020 and CC110x are very popular transceivers for WSN.
I think that is an interesting idea. How much of such a specification could be generic and how much would need to be specific to each of the radios? Can you describe the decisions you had to take in applying 6LoWPAN to these radios? And, even better, can you write a draft? Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
