The work is not controversial, Michael. It just happens that minimal uses OF0 as is and no change was suggested.
That text is thus useless/ obsolete since minimal has shipped to IESG. Take care, Pascal > Le 28 sept. 2015 à 17:16, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > I have read the proposed changes to the charter, and they seem to make sense > to me. > > The Blue/Yellow/Red changes do not come through email. (nor should they) > > I assumed that the slides are accurate in this regard, but this is what I > found in red in the slides: >> The work will include a best practice configuration for RPL and OF0 >> operation over the static schedule. Based on that experience the group may >> produce a requirements draft for OF0 extensions, to be studied in ROLL > > and I'm having difficulty seeing that as controversial. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
