I see. Thanks a lot Pat for the information! I found the document you
mentioned. I will update the format in the Golden Images.

Have a good day!
Tengfei

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:25 PM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Tengfei;
>
> The IEEE 802.15 IG 6T recommended a format for sub-IEs in document
> 15-15-0939-02 sent to this reflector on 30 November 2015.  The following is
> an excerpt from that document:
>
> "Accordingly, the IEEE 802.15 IG 6T recommends that the IETF use an
> alternate scheme that restricts each Payload IE to only one sub-type ID and
> content, i.e. no nesting.  The advantages of this recommended scheme is
> that it eliminates one octet from the total Payload IE, it allows a full
> 256 sub-type IDs, and each sub-type length can be up to 2046 octets.”
>
> Therefore, if 6tisch adopts the above recommendation, there would be no
> long or short types.
>
> Pat
>
> Pat Kinney
> *Kinney Consulting LLC*
> IEEE 802.15 WG vice chair, SC chair
> ISA100 co-chair, ISA100.20 chair
> O: +1.847.960.3715
> [email protected]
>
> On 8, Jan2016, at 10:14, Tengfei Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> As I mentioned on the Call, the 6top sublayer draft seems didn't  define
> the type of subIE used by 6P command ,long or short type?  Let me know if I
> missed it from the draft! Thanks you!
>
> Regard,
> Tengfei
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to